Image Credits: Global News
Canada’s largest guest-worker program is making headlines as labor leaders sound the alarm on its impact on Canadian workers. Mark Olsen, a prominent union leader, has voiced frustration over the lack of public awareness surrounding the International Mobility Program (IMP), a federal initiative that has quietly grown to bring more than one million foreign workers into Canada. Olsen believes this program is ripe for exploitation by employers, who take advantage of it to suppress wages and deny Canadians job opportunities.
The IMP has become the dominant stream of foreign labor entry, outpacing the more commonly known Temporary Foreign Worker Program (TFWP) by a staggering margin. Despite the government’s modest reductions to the TFWP, many fear that corporations will simply shift their focus to the IMP, exacerbating issues of wage disparity and exploitation.
The Shadow of Exploitation
Unlike the TFWP, the IMP does not require employers to prove that they are unable to fill positions with Canadian workers, a key factor in what many see as the exploitation of foreign workers. Olsen and his union believe that this loophole incentivizes employers to hire cheaper foreign labor, often at wages far below those offered to Canadians. In sectors such as construction, retail, and high tech, foreign workers are paid at or just above the median wage of $23 per hour—far less than their Canadian counterparts performing similar roles.
“This has led to a significant distortion in the labor market,” said Olsen, warning that the ease with which employers can sidestep hiring Canadians is not only hurting wages but also reducing opportunities for women, Indigenous people, and young workers.
Public Backlash and Political Hesitance
Recent public sentiment echoes Olsen’s concerns. An Angus Reid poll revealed that 56% of Canadians believe the influx of foreign workers is contributing to job and housing shortages. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has recently pledged to reduce the TFWP by 80,000 workers, but critics see this as mere window-dressing, given that the IMP continues to thrive with little oversight.
“Canadians are unaware of just how pervasive the IMP has become, and that’s exactly how corporations want it,” Olsen explained. The fear is that while political leaders make token gestures to reduce foreign labor, the real issues remain buried within programs like the IMP.
Proposed Reforms
Olsen’s union is pushing for critical reforms. They argue that the IMP should be subject to the same regulations as the TFWP, with employers required to prove a legitimate need for foreign workers. Furthermore, the union demands that guest workers be paid the same wages and offered the same benefits as Canadian workers to ensure fairness and prevent exploitation. They also propose creating pathways for foreign workers to gain Canadian citizenship.
While some union members are initially resistant to these ideas, Olsen is confident that most come around after understanding the principles of fairness and respect underlying these reforms.
A Divided Nation
Canada’s foreign worker programs have become a contentious topic, with many Canadians worried about the impact on their jobs and wages. The Angus Reid poll showed that only 24% of Canadians believe guest workers should be granted a pathway to citizenship, reflecting deep divisions in public opinion. As immigration continues to shape Canada’s economy and workforce, the debate over how to balance the needs of employers, foreign workers, and Canadian citizens is only set to intensify.
As labor leaders push for greater transparency and fairness in Canada’s guest-worker programs, the question remains: will Ottawa respond with meaningful reform, or will the IMP continue to operate in the shadows, further distorting the labor market?